Legal Opinion

Magee v. Commissioner of Corporations & Taxation

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 29, 1926PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.

This is a petition for the abatement of a part of the legacy and succession tax collected from the estate of the testatrix of the petitioners. It was brought under G. L. c. 65, § 27. It was heard upon a case stated and comes before us by report under G. L. c. 215, § 13. The testatrix died on July 6, 1919, seised of real estate in this Commonwealth and owning a considerable amount of tangible and intangible personal property. Her will was proved and allowed on August 4, 1919.

The single question for decision is whether the part of the legacy and succession tax assessed under St. 1919, c. 342, *514§…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Billings v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Shwab v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Lewellyn v. FrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Chanler v. KelseySupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Minot v. WinthropMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Bowe v. Secretary of CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  2. City of Miami Beach v. the Texas Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1940
  3. Worcester County National Bank v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  5. Commissioner of Banks v. Chase Securities Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API