Legal Opinion

Coolidge v. Commissioner of Corp. & Taxation

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 11, 1929PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rugg, C. J..

These are petitions brought, under G. L. c. 65, § 30, to determine the validity of succession taxes. The petitioners are trustees under a deed and declaration of trust executed on July 29,1907, by J. Randolph Coolidge and Julia Coolidge and the petitioners. By that deed a large amount of real and personal estate was transferred to the trustees by the settlors voluntarily and not as a bona fide purchase for full consideration in money or in money’s worth. The trustees were given extensive powers of management, investment and reinvestment with the right to determine *446finally what…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Reinecke v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Nichols v. CoolidgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Chase National Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. United States v. Jin Fuey MoySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Shwab v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Estate of MadisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. In Re Clark's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Worcester County National Bank v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  5. Bryant v. HackettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API