Legal Opinion

Crumpley v. Wack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 20, 1995PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

On these consolidated appeals the ultimate question pre*301sented for this Court’s determination is whether defendant is entitled to a release order pursuant to CPL 330.20. Such an order would direct the New York State Commissioner of Mental Health (the Commissioner) to terminate defendant’s continued in-patient status, without terminating the Commissioner’s responsibility for defendant (CPL 330.20 [1] [m]). We conclude the question must be answered in the negative.

In 1981 defendant successfully interposed an insanity defense and was acquitted of multiple crimes, including the…

3Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Hearst Corp. v. ClyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Matter of George L.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. People v. EscobarNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ballard v. ParkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. In re Michael RR.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Commissioner of Mental Health v. Glenn B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. State v. Maurice G.New York Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Matter of New York State Constr. Safety Assn. v. New York City Dept. of Health & Mental HygieneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API