Legal Opinion

People v. Escobar

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 30, 1984PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Jasen, J.

This appeal involves review of the Insanity Defense Reform Act of 1980 (L 1980, ch 548, as amd) to determine the applicable burden of proof to be applied to justify continued confinement of a defendant acquitted of a crime by virtue of a defense of insanity. More specifically, w'e are asked to decide whether the People’s statutorily placed burden of proof — “to the satisfaction of the court” — is *435fulfilled when the People establish by a fair preponderance of the credible evidence, rather than by clear and convincing evidence, that the defendant continues to suffer…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Matter of Torsney (Mental Hygiene)New York Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. People v. GillottiNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Matter of George L.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Matter of Oswald N.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. People Ex Rel. Thorpe v. Von HoldenNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Matter of Francis S.New York Court of Appeals · 1995

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API