Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Rain and Hail Ins.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 21, 1998No. 97-8028PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

After Rain and Hail refused to pay Douglas S. Meyer’s crop insurance claim, he sued, under diversity jurisdiction in federal court, Rain and Hail, National Farmers Union (Rain and Hail’s parent company), and Jay Conlon (a Rain and Hail agent). The defendants moved for summary judgment, asserting that federal statutes preempted Mr. Meyer’s state law claims and, in the alternative, that they were entitled to summary judgment on the merits. The district court rejected their preemption argument but granted their summary judgment motion on the merits. See Meyer v. National Farmers Union Prop. &…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn.California Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Specht v. JensenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  3. Kathy L. Kaul v. Robert T. Stephan, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  4. Schmeling v. NordamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  5. New York Life Insurance v. ViglasSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Meyer v. ConlonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API