Ten Broeck v. Wells, Fargo & Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California
At Law. On demurrer to complaint.
1Opinion of the Court
Hawley, J.,
(orally.') The defendant Wells, Fargo & Co. demurs to plaintiff’s complaint, upon the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The plaintiff is a married woman; the defendant Richard Ten Broeck is her husband, and is made a party defendant because his consent to be made a party plaintiff could not be obtained. The suit is brought to recover damages lor injuries received by plaintiff while a guest at the Bellevue Hotel. The legal title to the property at the time of the accident was in one E. F. Pierce, who, it is alleged, held the same in…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Smith v. ButtnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by6 opinions
- Goldstein v. HealyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Scholl v. BelcherOregon Supreme Court · 1912
- Early v. LoweWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1938
- Hendricks v. Maison Blanche Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
- Clark v. Chase Hotel Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.