Legal Opinion

State v. Megard

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 2004No. 03-399PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Gray

¶1 Kelly Dee Megard appeals from the order entered by the Nineteenth Judicial District Court, Lincoln County, which revoked his suspended sentences. We affirm.

¶2 The issue is whether the District Court violated Megard’s due process rights by admitting telephonic testimony at a hearing on a petition to revoke his suspended sentences.

BACKGROUND

¶3 Megard was incarcerated on three separate felony convictions and sentences, two for driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) and one for carrying a concealed weapon. Each sentence contained a suspended sentence with numerous conditions. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Marriage of Bonamarte v. BonamarteMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. FinleyMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. PedersenMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. KingeryMontana Supreme Court · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MegardMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. MegardMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. Ronald Martin Jr.Montana Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API