State v. Pedersen

¶1 Leslie James Pedersen appeals the District Court’s revocation of his suspended sentence. We affirm.

ISSUES

¶2 1. At a hearing on the revocation of his suspended sentence, were Pedersen’s due process rights violated when the District Court denied his request for a continuance and allowed the State to introduce drug test results, although drug use had not been alleged before the hearing?

¶3 2. Did the District Court abuse its discretion when it permitted the State to present evidence during the dispositional phase of the revocation hearing?

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶4 On October 22,2001,…