Legal Opinion

Golino v. Pereira, No. Cv 00 0802482 S (Nov. 5, 2001)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided November 5, 2001No. CV 00 0802482 SUnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

The defendant has moved for summary judgment in this automobile negligence case on the ground that the accidental failure of suit statute, § 52-592 of the General Statutes, does not save this action on the underlying facts. The relevant chronology is as follows.

The original action arises out of an automobile accident which allegedly occurred on September 7, 1995, and was brought in February, 1996. In March, 1997, the defendant filed a motion for nonsuit for failure to respond to a discovery…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hammer v. Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Batick v. SeymourSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. Daily v. New Britain Machine Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  4. Ruddock v. BurrowesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  5. Barrett v. Southern Connecticut Gas Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. Atlantic Health Services, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API