Legal Opinion
Gray v. Chessie System
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided July 23, 1984No. Civ. Y-83-4304PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOSEPH H. YOUNG, District Judge.
The plaintiff, through a stipulation of dismissal, has reduced his claim in this case to an action against an individual defendant for intentional interference with contractual relations. The defendant, by motion to dismiss, now seeks to obliterate the complaint entirely. Finding that the plaintiffs remaining claim is pre-empted by the provisions of the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seg., and that the plaintiff has not exhausted his remedies under the Act, this Court will dismiss the complaint.
This litigation is apparently the result of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Farmer v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 25Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Andrews v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Local 926, International Union of Operating Engineers v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Harold R. Magnuson v. Burlington Northern, Inc., D. S. Nelson, J. H. Woolford, and G. J. O'COnnellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- DeTomaso v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1987
- Quinn v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Joseph T. Lorenz, Jr. v. Csx Transportation, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Harris v. HirshNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Alfieri v. CSX Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.