Legal Opinion
United States v. Tyson
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided January 14, 2003PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WHALEN, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant Opal Tyson’s and Garnishee Ford Motor Company Retirement Trust’s objection to a writ of garnishment. The matter was referred to this Magistrate Judge for hearing and determination, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). Oral argument was heard on November 19, 2002, after which the parties filed supplemental briefs.
The issue before the Court is whether the anti-alienation provisions of the Employees Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and the Internal Revenue Code preclude the government from…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Burlington Northern Railroad v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Guidry v. Sheet Metal Workers National Pension FundSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- In Re Elizabeth Hayes Lucas, Debtor. Jane B. Forbes, Trustee v. Elizabeth Hayes Lucas, Holiday Corporation Savings and Retirement PlanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- United Metal Products Corporation v. National Bank of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Charles Herbert SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Raymond P. NovakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. HoskingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. JamesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
- United States v. MillerDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2008
- United States v. Raymond P. NovakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.