Legal Opinion

United States v. Raymond P. Novak

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 23, 2006No. 04-55838PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge.

The United States appeals from the district court’s order quashing its writ of garnishment of Raymond Novak’s benefits under a pension plan subject to the Employment and Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). The district court held that such a garnishment was prohibited by ERISA’s anti-alienation provision, 29 U.S.C. § 1056(d)(1). We reverse and remand because we determine that the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996 (“MVRA”), 18 U.S.C. § 3663A, in conjunction with 18 U.S.C. § 3613, constitutes a statutory exception to ERISA’s anti-alienation…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Guidry v. Sheet Metal Workers National Pension FundSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Shanbaum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  3. In Re: HornsbyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  4. In Re Jerry W. McIntyre and Waltrout McIntyre Debtors. Waltrout McIntyre v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. JamesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Raymond P. NovakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. Robinson (In Re Robinson)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  3. United States v. WahlenDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2006
  4. United States v. MacChioneDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
  5. Wagner v. Ultima Homes, Inc. (In re Vaughan Co. Realtors)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API