United States v. Raymond P. Novak
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge.
The United States appeals from the district court’s order quashing its writ of garnishment of Raymond Novak’s benefits under a pension plan subject to the Employment and Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). The district court held that such a garnishment was prohibited by ERISA’s anti-alienation provision, 29 U.S.C. § 1056(d)(1). We reverse and remand because we determine that the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996 (“MVRA”), 18 U.S.C. § 3663A, in conjunction with 18 U.S.C. § 3613, constitutes a statutory exception to ERISA’s anti-alienation…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Guidry v. Sheet Metal Workers National Pension FundSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Shanbaum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- In Re: HornsbyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- In Re Jerry W. McIntyre and Waltrout McIntyre Debtors. Waltrout McIntyre v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. JamesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Raymond P. NovakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Robinson (In Re Robinson)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. WahlenDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2006
- United States v. MacChioneDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
- Wagner v. Ultima Homes, Inc. (In re Vaughan Co. Realtors)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.