Smith v. Kingsley
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.
1. Where a debtor by deed conveyed real property, and included in the conveyance a statement that the grantee agreed to pay a certain debt which the grantor owed, and the grantee received such deed and the property conveyed thereby, the holder of the note evidencing the described debt of the grantor, upon the debt becoming due and remaining unpaid, could maintain an equitable proceeding against the last named grantee, to enforce the payment of such debt.
2. “Where a provision of the character indicated in the first headnote was contained in a deed conveying realty, . . and the grantee accepted…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Morgan v. ArgardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Union City Realty & Trust Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Williams Co. v. American Tie & Timber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- O'Leary v. CostelloSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kirk v. BraySupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
- Beasley v. BurtSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Alropa Corporation v. PomeranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Georgia Power Co. v. City of DecaturSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Persons v. DallasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.