Legal Opinion

Alcala v. Vazmar Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 17, 2008No. B191514, B192883PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HASTINGS, J. *

Plaintiffs Richard and Angie Alcala appeal from a defense verdict rendered in favor of defendant Earthbound Tire Center in a wrongful death action. In the published portion of this opinion, we conclude that the trial court did not commit error when it declined to instruct the jury on negligence per se. In the unpublished portion of this opinion, we conclude that the verdict was supported by substantial evidence, but that the trial court committed prejudicial error by refusing to admit a highly relevant and admissible statement made by defendant. Accordingly, we reverse…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Henderson v. Harnischfeger Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Absher v. AutoZone, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Logacz v. LimanskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Casey v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Orichian v. BMW of North America, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Beaver v. Tarsadia HotelsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2014
  3. Garcia Ex Rel. Marin v. Clovis Unified School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
  4. Maureen K. v. TuschkaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Taulbee v. EJ Distribution Corp., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API