Legal Opinion

Japan Food Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided August 2, 1966No. C.D. 2741PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Donxon, Judge:

Merchandise described as prepared dried fish powder was imported from Japan. Dried ground bonito (fish) and dried ground kelp, or seaweed, had been mixed in formula proportions, with seasonings and a preservative added, and thus was produced the imported powder. It was sold under the Japanese name “Niko Niko Bushi” Kikuya Brand, for use as soup stock.

The collector classified the merchandise at bar as an unenumerated manufactured article, an edible preparation for human consumption, dutiable under paragraph 1558 at 20 per centum ad valorem.

The claim in plaintiff’s protests in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. SmithCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  2. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  3. United States v. LobsitzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  4. U. S. Industrial Chemicals, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wakunaga of America Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API