United States v. Lobsitz
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge
The imported merchandise in the case at bar is admitted by the ■appellee to be a mixture of wool thread waste, artificial silk thread waste, and oil, etc. The analyst’s report, introduced in evidence, .gives the following:
Per cent
Wool.'._53.81
Artificial-silk_43.-12
Oil, etc___ 3. 07
100. 00
It is shown by the appraiser’s report offered in evidence and not ■controverted that the wool waste is the chief value of the merchandise. It is claimed by the Government and not denied, and appears from an inspection of the official sample, that the quantity or value of each class of commingled waste can not…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Downing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
3Cited by2 opinions
- Japan Food Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- Kraemer v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949