Legal Opinion

United States v. Lobsitz

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 29, 1929No. 3146PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge

The imported merchandise in the case at bar is admitted by the ■appellee to be a mixture of wool thread waste, artificial silk thread waste, and oil, etc. The analyst’s report, introduced in evidence, .gives the following:

Per cent

Wool.'._53.81

Artificial-silk_43.-12

Oil, etc___ 3. 07

100. 00

It is shown by the appraiser’s report offered in evidence and not ■controverted that the wool waste is the chief value of the merchandise. It is claimed by the Government and not denied, and appears from an inspection of the official sample, that the quantity or value of each class of commingled waste can not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Downing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Japan Food Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Kraemer v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API