Legal Opinion

State v. Latimore

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 14, 2012No. 27102PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Toal

Reginald R. Latimore (Petitioner) was convicted of violating section 23-3-470 of the South Carolina Code, S.C.Code Ann. § 23-3^470 (Supp.2011), by failing to timely re-register as a sex offender and received a sentence of ninety days of home incarceration with GPS monitoring. The court of appeals affirmed Petitioner’s sentence. State v. Latimore, 390 S.C. 88, 700 S.E.2d 456 (Ct.App.2010). We granted certiorari to consider Petitioner’s argument that the court of appeals erred in affirming the circuit court’s denial of Petitioner’s directed verdict motion, and now affirm that decision as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. State v. DickeySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  3. State v. LatimoreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BinnarrSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  2. State v. BinnarrSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API