State v. Latimore
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Toal
Reginald R. Latimore (Petitioner) was convicted of violating section 23-3-470 of the South Carolina Code, S.C.Code Ann. § 23-3^470 (Supp.2011), by failing to timely re-register as a sex offender and received a sentence of ninety days of home incarceration with GPS monitoring. The court of appeals affirmed Petitioner’s sentence. State v. Latimore, 390 S.C. 88, 700 S.E.2d 456 (Ct.App.2010). We granted certiorari to consider Petitioner’s argument that the court of appeals erred in affirming the circuit court’s denial of Petitioner’s directed verdict motion, and now affirm that decision as…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- State v. DickeySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- State v. LatimoreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. BinnarrSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
- State v. BinnarrSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012