Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 6, 1998No. 23 E.D. Appeal Docket 1996PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIGRO, Justice.

Appellant Calvin Johnson contends that the trial court erred in removing his counsel from this case after counsel violated a court order related to the discovery of mental health records. *300In affirming the trial court’s decision, the Superior Court ruled that an order removing counsel is immediately appeal-able. As discussed below, we hold that an order disqualifying counsel is interlocutory and is not immediately appealable. Thus, we reverse the Superior Court’s decision and remand for the entry of an order quashing the appeal.

Appellant was arrested in 1993 for the 1981…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Flanagan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. BosurgiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Pugar v. GrecoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Pridgen v. Parker Hannifin Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Vaccone v. SykenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Commonwealth v. ShearerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Commonwealth v. WellsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Commonwealth v. RuckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API