Legal Opinion

State v. Sandstrom

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 21, 1978No. 49,268, 49,660PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Owsley, J.:

This is an appeal from the trial court’s finding that petitioner Joe Pennington, a news reporter, was in direct criminal contempt for refusing to disclose the identity of a confidential *574news source. Petitioner filed a direct appeal and a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the court of appeals. The writ was denied. (In re Pennington, 1 Kan. App. 2d 682, 573 P.2d 1099 [1977].) Petition for review was granted by this court and upon motion the petition and direct appeal were consolidated for decision.

The issue on review is whether a news…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Stayton v. StaytonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. In the Matter of Paul PappasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  4. Rosato v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Application of Earl Caldwell and New York Times Company for an Order Quashing Grand Jury Subpoenas. Earl Caldwell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Schmeck v. City of ShawneeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  2. State v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  3. Berst v. ChipmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  4. State v. SielSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  5. People v. PawlaczykIllinois Supreme Court · 2000

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API