Legal Opinion

Highway Equipment Company, Inc., Plaintiff-Cross v. Feco, Ltd. And Stan Duncalf

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided November 21, 2006No. 05-1547, 05-1578PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINN, Circuit Judge.

FECO, Ltd. (“FECO”) appeals from a judgment of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa making final an order granting Highway Equipment Company, Inc.’s (“Highway Equipment”) summary judgment on FECO’s claim for wrongful termination of dealership and denying FECO’s motion for attorney fees and expenses pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285. Highway Equipment cross-appeals from the ruling that the district court had subject matter jurisdiction over FECO’s motion for attorney fees. Because the district court properly entertained FECO’s claim for attorney fees and did…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  4. Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Epps v. FowlerTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  2. In Re Deutsche Bank Trust Co. AmericasCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  3. Raniere v. Microsoft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  4. In re: Syngenta AG MIR162Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2023
  5. Monsanto Co. v. Bayer Bioscience N.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API