Legal Opinion
Monsanto Co. v. Bayer Bioscience N.V.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 25, 2008No. 2007-1109PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
This is a patent infringement case relating to chimeric genes. Plaintiff-Ap-pellee Monsanto Co. (“Monsanto”) brought a declaratory judgment action against Defendant-Appellant Bayer Bios-cience N.V. (“Bayer”) challenging the validity and unenforceability of four Bayer patents, U.S. Patent Nos. 5,545,565 (“the '565 patent”), 5,767,372 (“the '372 patent”), 6,107,546 (“the '546 patent”), and 5,254,799 (“the '799 patent”), and asserting that Monsanto’s transgenic corn products did not infringe these patents. Bayer appeals a final judgment, issued after jury trial, declaring…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kingsdown Medical Consultants, Ltd. And E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Hollister IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Paragon Podiatry Laboratory, Inc. v. Klm Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Becton Dickinson and Company v. C.R. Bard, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Digital Control v. The Charles MacHine Works (Also Known as Ditchwitch)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Eisai Co. Ltd. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Golden Hour Data Systems, Inc. v. emsCharts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Aventis Pharma S.A. v. Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Dodge-Regupol, Inc. v. RB Rubber Products, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Mike's Train House, Inc. v. BROADWAY LTD. IMPORTSDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2010
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.