Edelstein v. Department of Public Health & Addiction Services
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
This appeal involves the interpretation of the physician-patient privilege statute, General Statutes § 52-146o.1 The principal issues raised by this appeal are: (1) whether § 52-146o applies to medical records containing patient communications made before the effective date of the statute; and (2) if so, whether these records fall within the exception contained in § 52-146o (b) (3) for the disclosure of communications to a state agency in connection with its investigation of a licensed physician. The trial court ruled that the statute did not apply to the records at issue…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. MagnanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. MetzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. BlaskoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. HannaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- State v. NixonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. OrrSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Quarry Knoll II Corp. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Oxford Tire Supply, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. AndersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Byrne v. Avery Ctr. for Obstetrics & Gynecology, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.