Legal Opinion

Edelstein v. Department of Public Health & Addiction Services

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 29, 1997No. 15390PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NORCOTT, J.

This appeal involves the interpretation of the physician-patient privilege statute, General Statutes § 52-146o.1 The principal issues raised by this appeal are: (1) whether § 52-146o applies to medical records containing patient communications made before the effective date of the statute; and (2) if so, whether these records fall within the exception contained in § 52-146o (b) (3) for the disclosure of communications to a state agency in connection with its investigation of a licensed physician. The trial court ruled that the statute did not apply to the records at issue…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. MagnanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. State v. MetzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. State v. BlaskoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. State v. HannaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
  5. State v. NixonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. OrrSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  2. Quarry Knoll II Corp. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  3. Oxford Tire Supply, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  4. State v. AndersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  5. Byrne v. Avery Ctr. for Obstetrics & Gynecology, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2018

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API