Legal Opinion

Downs v. Atkinson

California Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1929No. Docket No. L.A. 9516PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

The judgment is affirmed and we justify this action as follows:

The suit is upon three disallowed claims against the estate of appellant’s intestate. Plaintiff had judgment in the sum of $4,493.19, interest and costs. The attack by appeal is upon the judgment as a whole; hence it is not necessary to consider the items that make it up.

The basis of the suit is a contract dated March 29, 1921, between plaintiff and the decedent, wherein decedent agreed to pay plaintiff ten per cent of the net profits received from a contract held by him for the construction of a section of the California state…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Daley v. RussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Krotzer v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Stone v. BancroftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Estate of WarnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Overton v. Vita-Food Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. California School Employees Ass'n v. Personnel CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. Gibbs v. WhelanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Payne v. Pathe Studios, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Patrick J. Ruane, Inc. v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API