Legal Opinion

Ringgold v. . Land

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 3, 1937PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSoheNCK, J.

The defendant demurred to the complaint for that it failed to allege a cause of action. The demurrer was overruled and the defendant reserved exception and appealed to the Supreme Court.

The pertinent portion of the complaint reads:

“3. That on 10 September, 1936, at 3 :30 p. m. the plaintiff was riding in a car driven by LeRoy Smith. The car stopped in front of the store of the defendant, T. E. Land, at 26 Middle Street. Upon stopping the car the defendant, T. E. Land, came up to the car and started a conversation with the plaintiff, in the presence of others in the car, and spoke of and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Osborn v. Leach.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Oates v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. Barnes v. . CrawfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  4. Payne v. . ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  5. Crawford v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Johnson v. BollingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Johnson v. BollingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. Stutts v. Duke Power Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Tallent v. BlakeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Williams v. Rutherford Freight Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API