Legal Opinion

Tallent v. Blake

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 18, 1982No. 8127SC868PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Judge.

Plaintiff instituted this action to recover actual and punitive damages resulting from “slanderous and defamatory statements” made by defendant. Defendant’s answer asserted truth as a defense.

Plaintiff’s evidence tended to show that she worked for the School Food Service of the Cleveland County Board of Education. She did secretarial work and bookkeeping. She prepared checks for the School Food Service employees by using the computer in the central office of the Board of Education; however, she did so under the direction of Peggy Fuller. Peggy Fuller was the computer operator for…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. PakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Weil v. . HerringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. Bryan Builders Supply v. MidyetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Badame v. LampkeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. Feibus & Co., Inc. v. Godley Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Donovan v. FiumaraCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  2. Phillips v. Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Market America, Inc. v. Christman-OrthCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  4. Long v. Vertical Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  5. RAYMOND U v. Duke UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API