Legal Opinion

Allen v. New Jersey Southern Railroad

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1875PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Vorst, J.

Reason suggests that an action to recover the assets of a corporation, which are claimed to have been illegally and fraudulently disposed of or converted by the *15trustees or directors, should be brought in the name of the corporation, the body which has directly sustained the injury.

The rights and property of the stockholders could be restored through such action, and authority in this regard is consonant with reason. In Gray agt. Lewis (L. R., vol. 8, page 1050), James, L. J., says: “ Where there is a corporate body capable of filing a bill" for itself to recover property either from its…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Robinson v. SmithNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  2. Cunningham v. PellNew York Court of Chancery · 1836
  3. Gardiner v. PollardThe Superior Court of New York City · 1863
  4. Kincaid v. DwinelleThe Superior Court of New York City · 1874

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brock v. . PoorNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Brothers v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.New York Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Stromeyer v. CombesNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1888
  4. Nelson v. BurrowsNew York Supreme Court · 1881
  5. People v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Supreme Court · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API