Legal Opinion
Dorado Services, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 30, 2016No. 16-945CPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Keywords: Post-Award Bid Protest; Small Business Administration; HUBZone Program; HUBZone Status Protest; Bid Protest Jurisdiction; 35% Residency Requirement
OPINION AND ORDER
KAPLAN, Judge.
This post-award bid protest involves a HUBZone status protest filed by Defendant-Intervenor GEO International Management, Inc. (GEO) in connection with the award of a HUBZone set-aside contract to Plaintiff Do-rado Services, Inc. (Dorado). On August 27, 2016, for reasons that are set forth more fully below, the Court denied the government’s motion to dismiss Dorado’s complaint. See Order Denying Mot. to…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Btas, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Senter, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- cr/zws, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018