Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Douglas v. Village of Holloway

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 10, 1903No. Nos. 13,569—(199)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Proceeding in the supreme court in the nature of quo warranto, upon relation of the attorney general, to determine the validity of the incorporation of the village of Holloway in Swift county.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Information in the nature of quo warranto to determine the validity of the incorporation of the village of Holloway, in Swift county. The facts, as they appear from the pleadings, and about which there is no real controversy, are substantially as follows: The people residing at the railway station called “Plolloway” sought to incorporate the same into a village under and pursuant to the provisions of Laws 1885, P-148 (c. 145). There were only about one hundred inhabitants in the village, residing upon the land embraced within the village plat— forty acres; and, to obtain the requisite…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. Minnetonka VillageSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  2. State ex rel. Childs v. Village of Fridley ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Danielson v. Village of MoundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. State ex rel. Simpson v. Village of DoverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  3. State ex rel. Simpson v. Village of AliceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  4. Grudnosky v. BislowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  5. State ex rel. Hilton v. City of NashwaukSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API