Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Childs v. Village of Fridley Park

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 22, 1895No. Nos. 9278—(67)PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Quo warranto against the village of Fridley Park. C. J. Swanson, President, Wm. McDermott, Recorder, P. Rydall, Treasurer, and S. .Knudson, John G-utwa'dt and Chas. A. Nelson, Trustees, of said village.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

This proceeding is to be determined by an application of the principles laid down in State v. Minnetonka, 57 Minn. 526, 59 N. W. 972, to the undisputed facts. From the maps made a part of the information and the answer, we learn that the territory included within the village in question is all of a fractional congressional township, except two sections in the southeast corner, *147lying on the east hank of the Mississippi river just north of the limits of the city of Minneapolis. It varies from 5 to 6 miles in length, and from 1 to 3 miles in width, and includes in area more than 15 square miles,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. Minnetonka VillageSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Danielson v. Village of MoundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. State ex rel. Town of Holland v. LammersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  3. State ex rel. Childs v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  4. State ex rel. Simpson v. Village of DoverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  5. State ex rel. Simpson v. Village of AliceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API