Legal Opinion

C. Q. R. v. Wafula

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 8, 2020No. A161470PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

344 Argued and submitted May 9, 2019, affirmed July 8, 2020 C. Q. R., Petitioner-Respondent, v. Phillip Wekesa WAFULA, Respondent-Appellant. Multnomah County Circuit Court 15SK01817; A161470

471 P3d 786

Petitioner obtained a permanent stalking protective order (SPO) under ORS 30.866(1). Respondent appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence for an SPO. Petitioner and respondent met when respondent followed petitioner into a coffee shop and asked her on a date, which petitioner declined, telling him that she was in a relationship and not interested. Thereafter, respondent—who,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Delgado v. SoudersOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Reitz v. ErazoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. King v. W. T. F.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. Braude v. BraudeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. Miller v. HoeferCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. H. L. P. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  2. M. F. v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  3. M. F. v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API