C. Q. R. v. Wafula
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
344 Argued and submitted May 9, 2019, affirmed July 8, 2020 C. Q. R., Petitioner-Respondent, v. Phillip Wekesa WAFULA, Respondent-Appellant. Multnomah County Circuit Court 15SK01817; A161470
471 P3d 786
Petitioner obtained a permanent stalking protective order (SPO) under ORS 30.866(1). Respondent appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence for an SPO. Petitioner and respondent met when respondent followed petitioner into a coffee shop and asked her on a date, which petitioner declined, telling him that she was in a relationship and not interested. Thereafter, respondent—who,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Delgado v. SoudersOregon Supreme Court · 2002
- Reitz v. ErazoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- King v. W. T. F.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Braude v. BraudeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- Miller v. HoeferCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- H. L. P. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- M. F. v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
- M. F. v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023