Legal Opinion

Metcalf v. Shamel

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 7, 1959No. Civ. 23223PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment that there was owing to plaintiff Jess E. Metcalf the principal sum of $51,624.20 plus interest on account of the indebtedness of defendant Lite Products Sales, Inc. (hereinafter called Products) ; that said indebtedness constituted a lien upon the 49 per cent of the 500 shares of the capital stock of defendant Products owned by the defendant J. W. Shamel; and that said lien and pledge be foreclosed by the sale of all right, title and interest of defendant Shamel in and to said shares of the capital stock of Products or so much thereof as shall be necessary…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Teel v. GaskillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Smith v. BullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Ambriz v. Petrolane Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Chase v. Super-Cold Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Rankin v. Frebank Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API