State v. Rogowski
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Justice.
Defendant appeals from his convictions and sentences following the entry of guilty pleas to four counts of third degree burglary, A.R.S. § 13-1506; three counts of felony theft, A.R.S. § 13-1802; one count of misdemeanor theft, A.R.S. § 13-1802; and one count of trafficking in stolen property, A.R.S. § 13-2307. We assumed jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 47(e)(5), Rules of the Supreme Court, 17A A.R.S.
We must decide three questions:
1. Was the sentence as to trafficking in stolen property double punishment?
2. Were the pleas of guilty intelligently and voluntarily made, and was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. TinghitellaArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. GordonArizona Supreme Court · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. HallmanArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. GriffinArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. McInellyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- State v. SalinasArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Fowler v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.