Legal Opinion

Gonzalez v. City of Chicago

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided May 30, 1995No. 94 C 7704PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, District Judge:

Plaintiff Ercilio Gonzalez brings this three-count first amended complaint against the City of Chicago (“City”) and certain members of its police force. Defendant City has moved to dismiss Counts I and II, or in the alternative, to strike portions of Count II. For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion is granted in part and denied in part.

I. Background 1

Gonzalez alleges that individual defendants Rolon, Lopez and Brzoza, officers of the Chicago Police Department, engaged in a scheme to retaliate against him and his family because of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Horne v. CrozierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Albert Trostel & Sons Co. v. NotzDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2008
  3. Brown v. City of Fort WayneDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2010
  4. Vakharia v. Little Co. of Mary Hospital & Health Care CentersDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
  5. Horne v. CrozierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API