Legal Opinion
Claim of Haney v. Schiavone Construction
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 1, 1993PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrew Iii, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed July 29, 1991, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant’s spouse was entitled to an increased payment for home care services.
Claimant sustained a compensable injury on or about December 18, 1980 and was thereafter awarded benefits. In *629January 1984, an issue was raised regarding claimant’s need for home care. Ultimately, a Workers’ Compensation Law Judge classified claimant as being permanently totally disabled, granted home care seven days per week and directed the carrier to pay $525 per week from January 1, 1981 to date and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Claim of Nallan v. Motion Picture Studio Mechanics Union, Local No. 52New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Claim of Nallan v. Motion Picture Studio Mechanics Union, Local No. 52Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Claim of Berkowitz v. Highmount HotelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Claim of Mamone v. GriegeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Claim of Leskin v. Savin Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
3Cited by7 opinions
- Claim of Manning v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Claim of Rochel v. Gardiner Manor MallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Raponi v. Orange & Rockland Utilities, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Claim of Manning v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Matter of Whitney v. Pregis Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.