Legal Opinion

Hallmark Insurance v. Crary Enterprises, Inc.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1976No. 701 (1974)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.

The sole issue presented on appeal is whether the nonliability status of an employee as an insured accrues to the benefit of his employer when the status is obtained independent of such employment.

In reaching its decision the trial court correctly acknowledged the general rule that an insurer cannot recover by right of subrogation from its own insured. Much emphasis was laid on the case of New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Homans-Kohler, Inc. (D. C. R. I. 1969), 305 Fed. Supp. 1017, subsequent action (1970), 310 Fed. Supp. 374, affirmed (1st Cir.), 435 Fed. 2d 1232. See also: 6A Appleman,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hensel v. Hensel Yellow Cab Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Miller v. KujakWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Culver v. WebbWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Le Sage v. Le SageWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Kauth v. LandsverkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Swanigan v. State Farm InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. First National Bank of Columbus v. HansenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Maynard v. City of MadisonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  4. Rural Mutual Insurance v. PetersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Home Indemnity Company v. Robert E. ShafferCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API