Legal Opinion
Hull v. Sawchyn
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided August 10, 2001No. 78181PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Patricia Ann Blackmon, Judge.
Appellant Peter H. Hull appeals from the trial court’s granting of summary judgment in favor of appellee Ivan Sawchyn. Hull argues that Sawchyn is a vexatious litigator; consequently, Hull’s summary judgment motion should have been granted. Hull assigns the following errors for our review:
“I. The trial court committed prejudicial error by converting defendant-appellee’s ‘motion to dismiss’ to a ‘motion for summary judgment’ and is suing a ruling thereon without notifying plaintiff-appellant of the conversion.
“II. The trial court committed prejudicial error by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Dupler v. Mansfield Journal Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1980
- Northeast Ohio Apartment Ass'n v. Cuyahoga County Board of County CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ceasor v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- Garmback v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Blue v. Bur. of Workers' Comp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
- Davie v. Nationwide Ins. Co. of Am.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Tanglewood Shopping Ctr., L.L.C. v. Riser Foods Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.