Ceasor v. City of Cleveland
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
TIM McCORMACK, P.J.:
{¶ 1} Defendants-appellants, the city of East Cleveland ("the city") and East Cleveland patrol officer Kyle Pettus ("Pettus"), appeal from the trial court's denial of their motion for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, we affirm and remand.
Procedural and Substantive History
{¶ 2} This appeal stems from a wrongful death action instituted against the city of East Cleveland. The following factual summary is based on the Ohio State Highway Patrol Reconstruction Report. Both parties relied on this report in their filings before the trial court.
{¶ 3} On October 3,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. MaurerOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Anderson v. City of MassillonOhio Supreme Court · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- DeepRock Disposal Solutions, L.L.C. v. Forté Prods., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
- Garmback v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Blue v. Bur. of Workers' Comp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
- Morrison v. Warrensville Hts.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Boucher v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.