Legal Opinion
Hickerson v. Bender
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 25, 1993No. C7-92-2463PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTEN, Judge.
Appellants Mary and Perry John Hicker-son, Jr. (“Jack” Hickerson) challenge the trial court’s determination that an ingress-egress easement to a lake was extinguished by abandonment and adverse possession. We affirm.
FACTS
In 1955, George and Lucille Fagan, owners of Lot Twenty, H.R. White First Subdivision of Gull Lake Shores in Cass County, conveyed a parcel of property on nearby Ruth Lake to Anna Marie and Roy Becker. The deed also granted the following easement at issue in this case:
An easement appurtenant in fee simple for the purpose of ingress to and egress from Gull…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gruenhagen v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Norton v. Duluth Transfer Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- United Parking Stations, Inc. v. Calvary TempleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Simms v. FaganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Richards Asphalt Co. v. Bunge Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Denman v. GansCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Paul M. Dobis v. David L. Scegura, Trustee of the David L. Scegura Trust, David Catlin, Patricia Ann CatlinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017