Floyd v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
' COURTNEY HUDSON GOODSON, Associate Justice
11 Appellant Phillip Floyd appeals from the Carroll County Circuit Court’s order disqualifying his lawyer, Gerald <K. Crow, because Crow had previously served in a judicial capacity in the criminal proceedings. Because we agree that. Crow’s participation in the case was personal and substantial, we- affirm the circuit court’s order removing him as. Floyd’s counsel.
The appeal in this case stems from the underlying criminal charges against Floyd for one count of rape. On August 5, 2014, when Crow was a circuit judge, he authorized the issuance of an…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Boldridge v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- Burnette v. MorganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Norman v. NormanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Hamm v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- Stewart v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Marvin Stanton v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2023
- Marilyn and Scott Turnbow v. Hiegel Building Solutions, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2024
- Floyd v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
- Helena Country Club v. BrocatoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017
- Helena Country Club v. BrocatoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.