Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Martin

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 14, 2014No. CV-14-358PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONALD L. CORBIN, Justice.

| Appellant Valerie Bailey brings the instant appeal from an order of the Pulaski County Circuit Court, Special Judge John Cole presiding, granting a declaratory judgment and issuing a writ of mandamus in favor of Appellee Kristen Hulse on the basis that Bailey was not a qualified or eligible candidate for the office of circuit judge pursuant to section 16 of amendment 80 to the Arkansas Constitution. On appeal, Bailey argues that (1) a writ of mandamus was inapplicable and Hulse’s petition should have been dismissed; (2) no rule provides that an administrative…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. YatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Jenkins v. BogardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Valley v. BogardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Pederson v. StracenerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  5. Ball v. Phillips County Election CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Siloam Springs v. La-De, LLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  2. Bailey v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  3. City of Siloam Springs v. La-De, LLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  4. Gray v. Thomas-BarnesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  5. Gray v. Thomas-BarnesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API