Legal Opinion

United States v. Arthur G. McKee & Co.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided March 22, 1956No. Civ. A. No. 32109PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONNELL, District Judge.

There is here before the Court a motion filed by the defendant, Arthur G. McKee & Company, to dismiss the complaint because the plaintiff fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted: defendant claims this suit is barred by the Statute of Limitations pertaining to such actions. This motion is filed under Rule 12(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.

The complaint, filed on behalf of the Government, states that the United States Treasury Department paid to the defendant, on or about January 9, 1946, the sum of $235,085.75 in redemption of bonds…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Old Colony Railroad v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Lynch v. Alworth-Stephens Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. United States v. WurtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Joseph Weidenhoff, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959
  2. Nelson Specialty Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1957
  3. Joseph Weidenhoff, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API