Legal Opinion

Hale v. Lipham

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 12, 1941No. 28663PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, P. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) In his petition as finally amended the plaintiff alleged, in substance, that he had sold the real estate to Freeman for a consideration of $1000, and had given Freeman a deed thereto, but that Freeman had not paid the plaintiff the purchase-money, and was indebted to the plaintiff therefor; that it was agreed between the plaintiff and the defendant, and also Freeman, that the plaintiff would consent to Freeman’s selling the property to the defendant for a consideration of $1000, and that the plaintiff would relinquish any claim which he might have against…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tift v. Wight & Weslosky Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Kiser Co. v. PadrickCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  3. Bridges v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  4. Hale v. LiphamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  5. Holcomb v. MashburnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brown v. WallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  2. Gwinnett Concrete Co. v. LemosCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API