Kiser Co. v. Padrick
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
Without the slightest desire to bury the demurrers of the plaintiff in error, we think it unnecessary to set them forth in detail. The points which they raised may be sufficiently indicated by our rulings as announced in the headnotes.
The most important question involved is whether the agreement was void as against public policy. The principal Georgia case on this question seeixxs to be that of Graham v. Theis, 47 Ga. 479. There it appears that one person was induced, for a consideration, not to bid at an administrator’s sale, by another, who did bid and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Graham v. TheisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1873
- Barnes v. MaysSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- Ruis v. BranchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
3Cited by23 opinions
- Anderson, Clayton & Co. v. ManghamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Butler v. GodleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Padrick v. Kiser Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Crawley v. SelbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Southern Land, Timber & Pulp Corp. v. Davis & Floyd Engineers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.