Legal Opinion

Gray Company, Inc. v. The Spee-Flo Manufacturing Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 19, 1966No. 22354_1PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTLE, Chief Judge:

This is the third patent case to be decided by our Court since the recent important decision by the United States Supreme Court in the four patent cases: Graham v. John Deer Company, 1965, (Calmar v. Cook, Colgate Chemical Co. v. Cook) 383 U.S. 1, 86 S.Ct. 684, 15 L.Ed.2d 545 and United States v. Adams, 383 U.S. 39, 86 S.Ct. 708, 15 L.Ed.2d 572, 1965. This case, as did the earlier of the two others decided by our Court, Zero Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Mississippi Milk Producers Asso., (5 Cir.) 358 F.2d 853, Mar. 22, 1966, presents for our consideration, in addition to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Lever Bros. Co. v. Procter & Gamble Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
  4. Zero Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Mississippi Milk Producers AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  5. Spee-Flo Manufacturing Corp. v. Gray Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Leesona Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  2. Rohm and Haas Co. v. Dawson Chemical Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1983
  3. Shields v. Halliburton Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1980
  4. Wells Mfg. Corp., a Wisconsin Corporation v. Littelfuse, Inc., a Texas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  5. Ransburg Electro-Coating Corp. v. Ionic Electrostatic CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API