Legal Opinion

Hatch v. Wolack

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1946No. Docket No. 62, Calendar No. 43,482PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBtttzel, C. J.

Jesse E. Hatch and Alice L. Hatch, husband and wife, seek specific performance of a contract for the deed of a lot together with the house constructed thereon. They allege that defendant Sol Z. Wolack represented that he was the owner of a certain lot located in the city of Detroit, and that on September 13,1945, plaintiffs purchased the lot paying Wolack $1,000 for it; that contemporaneously with such purchase Wolack agreed in a separate contract to erect upon the lot a residence for the plaintiffs; that plaintiffs paid an additional $1,000 on the price of $7,750 to be paid Wolack for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lamb v. HinmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Henrikson v. HenriksonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Lyle v. MunsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Thorbahn v. Walker's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Mahon v. SahrationMichigan Supreme Court · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Duke v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Parceluk v. KnudtsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Jaye v. TobinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Zaborski v. KutylaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. McCrea v. JerkatisMichigan Supreme Court · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API