State Ex Rel. New Mexico Water Quality Control Commission v. Molybdenum Corp. of America
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
The State’s amended complaint alleged the defendant discharged water containing mine tailings on three occasions. Two of the discharges were alleged to have been directly into the Red River. One discharge was alleged to have been into a campground and subsequently into the Red River. The amended complaint alleged the violation of two water quality control regulations — by failing to make immediate notification of the discharges to the appropriate government agency and by disposing of refuse in a natural watercourse. The State asked that a civil penalty be imposed for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- State v. HerreraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
- London v. BruskasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
- State Ex Rel. Burgum v. HookerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
- State ex rel. Beck v. BashamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- New Mexico v. General Electric Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2004
- Espinosa v. Roswell Tower, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
- Espinosa v. Roswell Tower, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995