Legal Opinion

Taggart v. Risley

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1872PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from Multnomah County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

*238By the Court,

McArthur, J.:

This suit was instituted by Taggart against Eisley and others, to quiet the title to lot 7, in block 212, in the city of Portland, and to compel the execution of conveyances thereof by the appellants. It appears from the pleadings that, on June 25, 1850, D. H. Lownsdale, being .then in possession of the lot aforesaid, executed a deed conveyiug all his interest in said lot to W. W. Chapman, wherein he covenanted to warrant and defend the same to said Chapman, his heirs and assigns, against all persons except the United States; and also, that should he afterwards…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Van Renesselaer v. KearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  2. Nolle v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1860
  3. Bean v. WelshSupreme Court of Alabama · 1850
  4. Fitzhugh's Heirs v. TylerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1849
  5. Southgate v. MontgomeryNew York Court of Chancery · 1828

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Raymond v. FlavelOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  2. High v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Gardner v. WrightOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  4. United States National Bank v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Chase v. McKenzieOregon Supreme Court · 1916

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API