Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Gordon

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 28, 2000No. 43A03-0001-CV-25PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOFFMAN, Senior Judge

Appellant-Respondent Benny B. Gordon appeals from the trial court’s grant of a protective order requested by Appellee-Petitioner Janet A. Gordon. We affirm.

Benny raises four issues for our review, which we restate as:

1. Whether the trial court had jurisdiction to issue a protective order.

2. Whether the allegations of the petition, and the evidence in support thereof, form a sufficient basis for issuance of the protective order.

3. Whether the terms of the protective order are impermissibly vague, ambiguous, and/or overbroad.

4. Whether the portion of the protective…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Vaillancourt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Meyer v. WolvosIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Local Union No. 135 v. Merchandise Warehouse Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. A.H. v. C.E.G., on behalf of G.S.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Winebrenner v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Winebrenner v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API