Legal Opinion

A.H. v. C.E.G., on behalf of G.S.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 11, 2014No. 49A05-1310-PO-525Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRONE, Judge.

Case Summary

C.E.G. employed A.H. and G.S. C.E.G. petitioned for an injunction, against A.H. on behalf of G.S. pursuant to the Workplace Violence Restraining Orders Act (“WVROA”), which the trial court granted. 1 A.H. appeals, arguing that because this case involves or grows out of a labor dispute, it is governed by the Anti-Injunction Act (“ALA”), and therefore the trial court was without jurisdiction to issue the injunction pursuant to the WVROA. We agree. 2 Therefore, we reverse and remand with instructions to dismiss C.E.G.’s petition without prejudice.

Facts and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. Oddi-SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Brady v. National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  3. Matter of Lewis Tree Serv., Inc. v. Fire Dep't of the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Nordman v. North Manchester Foundry, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Pompey v. PrynerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API