Legal Opinion

Lexington Marketing Group, Inc. v. Goldbelt Eagle, LLC

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 2007No. S-12171PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Goldbelt Corporation is a majority shareholder of both Goldbelt Eagle, LLC and CP Leasing, Inc. Goldbelt Eagle entered into a contract for marketing services with Lexington Marketing Group (Lexington), a Virginia corporation wholly owned by Lisbeth Gnug-noli. The agreement contained an arbitration clause. In May 2005 Lexington filed a complaint in superior court, requesting that the court compel arbitration of a dispute over whether Goldbelt Eagle owed it compensation for a referral under the marketing contract. The superior court granted summary…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Méndez-Acevedo v. Nieves RiveraSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2010
  2. Classified Employees Ass'n v. Matanuska-Susitna Borough School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Harris v. Ahtna, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Hudson v. Citibank (South Dakota) NAAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Gibson v. Nye Frontier Ford, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API